Chapter 319: The Unconventional Duality of Love

"The Best way to investigate is 

to simply observe."

-- Ezra Dunster 

There has always been a great debate in leading scholars of thought within and among the Celestial Beings about the utility of love, including the accomplishment and regulation of desires, apart from its immediate role in the upkeep of lasting peace. It was the center of many written essays about the human condition, either penitent or triumphant, that was spearheaded by various accomplished poets, novelists, and musicians to the point that it became more of an abstract concept rather than creating a consensus for those who can actually feel its complexity in both situations of victory and wrath.

Within the Heavens and from many other wisdom to be gathered elsewhere (maybe from the deeply embedded realities of the cosmos or secretly situated in interdimensional substances waiting to be discovered), the purpose of love has always been considered to be a sign of weakness. In a world where greatness is valued, the Heavens always wondered about the role of love, other than being used in the salvation of mankind. In fact, in most Guardianship courses offered by Burnhall University about love and protection, not much is discussed about its greater role that would be useful to any form of skirmish with the evil matter or the dark arts.

But while contradictory rhetoric is ever present in the writing of the many verses about sophisticated topics or settings confusing love with greatness, or even equating the two to be an equal component of one another, a topic that has been gradually developed in epistemology, and was further developed in the elucidated theory governing the so-called unconventional Duality of Love (some refer to the paradox). It is through this crucial literary piece that ultimately became the gold standard for any attempt of celestial value to define the necessity of the question of romantic phenomenon in inquiring about the characteristics of infinity as to why eternity necessarily exists without a predefined beginning or end.

For many scholars of Love, eternity is the embodiment of the defined duality (i.e., the union of love and greatness) in a brutal attempt to oversimplify the controversial question of thought. For eternal presence to exist, these two important substances must become the material substance that envelopes the manipulative tendency of the cosmos to create or destroy, and it is fully dependent on love to sustain any type of being to persist in a reality where impossibilities exist, and greatness become benificiary at a boundary.

But this definition begs the question of further identifying the qualities of love in order to follow this pattern of metaphysical state, and no other explanation has yet been offered to further solidify the theoretical underpinnings governing the question of progress about the essence of eternity. Will God continue to exist if eternity becomes compromised, assuming that eternity is a separate entity apart from God? If God is equated with eternity, and this phenomenon happened, then his existence depends on something that can be destroyed, and the claim that God is almighty will be then falsified by the direct use of absolute reason.

Again, to presuppose this equation of love in consideration of the material presence of God is the only feasible way so far to put the essence of eternity into a perfect episteme, which is a valid route to take for the meantime because human faculty is limited in knowing everything about God's situation or his appointed place in this universe.

However, by examining further the celestial substance, can there be another known reason to redefine the important presence of light in the midst of utmost darkness, which must be a valid dissertation to activate the cosmos into obeying the metaphysical revealing of such absolute truth? Perhaps many speculations exist elsewhere that can very much satisfy the presence of the light as it was correlated to the metaphysical state of ultimate goodness.

If evil needs goodness to exist, and then goodness needs God, does God rely on eternity to exist in order to do good and wondrous deeds? Or does he simply dwell in the claim of his omnipotence as a way to somehow respond to the existential question? Again, in the macro level of the understanding, this is also true, because there is nothing impossible to God. But while this subject to a conclusion must consist of its many different parts, then these different parts are the topic of inquiry which needs to be furtherly resolved.

For now, human souls must be content in the concept of life's dependence to the power and love of God, and taking into consideration its implied duality.

x------------x

This Chapter is sponsored by Versace.